A team is always humans plus AI. Your build team is you, an engineer when you are stuck, and four agents that help you build: PM, Developer, QA, DevOps.
A team is always humans plus AI. Never AI alone, which ships things nobody asked for. Never humans alone, which is a bet against the leverage curve. The trap most companies fall into is hiring humans for roles that are now agent work: a junior PM, a junior developer, a junior QA. Keep humans for what only humans can do, let agents hold everything else.
This protocol is about the team that builds. You will meet the go-to-market side later; for the next two days the only team that matters is the one that gets your system live.
A team is never AI alone and never humans alone. AI alone ships things nobody asked for and nobody checked. Humans alone is a bet against the leverage curve: hiring a junior PM, a junior developer, a junior QA in 2026 is paying for work an agent does in an afternoon.
The Infinite Leverage bet: keep humans for what only humans can do, let agents hold everything else. This protocol is about the smallest version of that team, the one that builds.
Two human seats. One is always filled. The other is on call.
Each one is a folder (Protocol 03) with a role, skills, context, routines, guardrails, and a Definition of Done. You direct them, review their output, and own the judgment calls. They hold the execution volume.
The build team gets the system live. The next agents work off the data it collects, and each is the same folder with a different job (Protocol 15). Start with lead triage. Then, for the ones moving fast:
Every time you feel the urge to hire someone for the build, ask: can an agent hold this seat for the first 12 months? For PM, Developer, QA, and DevOps the answer is usually yes. For you, and for the engineer who unblocks you, the answer is no.
If the answer for a seat is yes, you have just found leverage your competitors are paying salaries for.
Open a doc. List every person who touches your product today, including contractors. You will map each to one of the six build seats, mark the gaps, then practice the four-item brief on a real blocker.
Every full-time person, part-time, contractor, freelancer. Names and current job title.
You, Engineer, PM, Developer, QA, DevOps. Some people fill more than one. That is fine; note it.
Two writers? One human PM and the PM agent? Two QAs? Where you have human + agent in the same role, ask: does the human still need to be there, or has the agent absorbed the work?
Any of the four agent seats with no one? Install the agent, do not hire. No engineer on call? Find one now, before you need one at 11 PM.
Pick a blocker from any project, solved or not. Write the four items: exact error, last commit, what you tried, what you think is going on. Notice how often item four is the answer.
A team map showing humans, agents, and gaps, and a practiced four-item brief you can run cold. A starting list for the next hire conversation, and the next not-hire conversation.
You map your team to the two human seats and four agent seats. Gaps become visible. Then you run a real PM-to-Developer handoff and see exactly how the seams work.